Mint Snuff – 10/11/05

Q: Please let me know if your program is promoting mint snuff (a non-tobacco edible chew made of mint) as an alternative to chew/snuff and/or if you know of any contraindication for using the product.

A:

  1. Alabama: We do not currently use this product in our program, but have distributed samples in the past. We know of no contraindications to mint snuff. We no longer offer samples due to budget constraints, but the product was well-received by Alabama smokeless users who were trying to quit.

  2. Ohio: The Tobacco Use Prevention and Control Foundation haven't endorsed this product, but we do have a few grantees that offer mint snuff as a replacement for highly addicted adults trying to quit smokeless tobacco. Along with this product goes an educational component about slowly tapering off this product too. Obviously, it is not used for everyone, nor recommended for everyone, but it does seem to be effective for some. Based upon the grantees' experience, it seems as though it is not recommended for use with youth since it may in fact encourage ST use, instead of discourage it.

  3. West Virginia: I was introduced to mint snuff several years ago at an American Dental Association meeting. With my interest in tobacco education/cessation, especially with regards to smokeless, I spent some time at the display and following the meeting keep in contact with the individual at the display (names slips my mind). That was the first I had heard of a non-tobacco chew.

    There was concern that it would be used as a start-up product instead of a method of helping with cessation. I would not say we (WV) have ever "promoted" mint snuff, however, due to my expressed interest in the product the mint snuff company used my name in some of there newsletters. I was uneasy about that and let them know. To my knowledge there is no contraindication to using the product.

    Once I had been introduced to the idea of using a non-tobacco chew as a cessation tool, I learned there are a number of similar products. A few years ago prior to the IRB complicating the process, I conducted a pilot study with (as I recall) about 50-60 smokeless tobacco users. I asked them to evaluate the following non-tobacco chews: Mint Snuff, Golden Eagle, Smokey Mountain and Bacc Off. Each company provided a variety of flavors. I learned the brand that was selected as most similar to tobacco was BACC OFF. You can locate them by doing a search on DIP STOP.

    I also asked the individuals in the study to mix the various products with their tobacco and evaluate the flavor, texture and etc. The point is I was looking for a product that would be most acceptable to use to mix with tobacco to reduce the nicotine the user receives but still retain a chew. A way of cutting back in steps to move from tobacco to non-tobacco chew. This approach is an attempt to separate the nicotine addiction from the habit.

    I have shared the approach with dentists and some have reported it to be a helpful cessation tool. I think the approach is appropriate if used properly with individuals that have attempted to quit and found it very difficult to go without a chew.

    The National Spit Tobacco Education Program does not promote non-tobacco chew because their primary target is to prevent kids from starting in the first place. No one want to use a product that could be thought of as a start up product. (Response from West Virginia University Department of Dentistry)

    Several states responded that they do not promote mint snuff, and only promote cessation and NRT.

Back to Table of Contents

 

 

contact_email